IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/otamic/v9y2017i1p1604-1614n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System

Author

Listed:
  • Brioso Xavier

    () (Construction Management & Technology Reserarch Group (GETEC), Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Av. Universitaria 1801, Lima 32, Peru)

  • Murguia Danny

    ()

  • Urbina Alonso

    () (Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel Lima 32, Peru)

Abstract

This article presents strategies for teaching scheduling methods such as takt-time, flowlines, and point-to-point precedence relations (PTPPRs) using build­ing information modeling (BIM) models in the Last Planner System. This article is the extended version of the article entitled “Teaching Takt-Time, Flowline and Point-to-point Precedence Relations: A Peruvian Case Study,” which has been published in Procedia Engineering (Vol. 196, 2017, pages 666-673). A case study is conducted in final year students of civil engineering at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru. The mock-up project is an educational building that has high repetitive processes in the struc­tural works phase. First, traditional tools such as Excel spreadsheets and 2D drawings were used to teach produc­tion system design with takt-time, flowlines, and PTPPR. Second, 3D and 4D models with Revit 2016 and Navis­works 2016 were used to integrate the previous schedules with a BIM model and to identify its strengths and weak­nesses. Finally, Vico Office was used for the automation of schedules and comparison of the methods in 4D and 5D. This article describes the lectures, workshops, and simu­lations employed, as well as the feedback from students and researchers. The success of the teaching strategy is reflected in the survey responses from students and the final perceptions of the construction management tools presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Brioso Xavier & Murguia Danny & Urbina Alonso, 2017. "Comparing three scheduling methods using BIM models in the Last Planner System," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 1604-1614, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:1604-1614:n:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/otmcj.2017.9.issue-1/otmcj-2016-0024/otmcj-2016-0024.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:1604-1614:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com/services/journals .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.