Author
Listed:
- O’Leary Timothy
(Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia)
- Vaz-Serra Paulo
(Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia)
Abstract
The accurate estimation of project costs is pivotal for the ongoing financial success of construction companies. Despite the clear definition of direct costs in tendering information, indirect costs (also known as project overheads and preliminaries) are often overlooked or underestimated. These costs are influenced by various factors, including company resource availability, site and project characteristics, contractual conditions and procurement methods. The pricing of preliminaries is a complex task, and the varying nature of these costs, coupled with the lack of transparency in current pricing practices, can lead to significant discrepancies in tender pricing. The challenge is to identify what should be included in preliminaries and arrive at a value in practice. This research has explored how contractors’ estimating departments address the complexities of pricing preliminaries for building and civil infrastructure works, particularly considering stringent contractual requirements and post-pandemic construction market disruptions. Through a literature review and an online survey of 30 senior estimators from major contractors, addressing 18 questions, the research sought to understand current practices, differing approaches and metrics employed in pricing preliminaries during the tendering stage. The multifaceted nature of preliminary studies was examined, offering a structured analysis of their categorisation, estimation methods, associated challenges and the impact of project delivery methods. The findings reveal that each contractor processes the pricing of preliminaries using certain tendering gateways and a variety of different metrics. This indicates that systematic risk and pricing models for contractors may lack a justifiable basis, with existing pricing models facing acceptance challenges across different contractors.
Suggested Citation
O’Leary Timothy & Vaz-Serra Paulo, 2025.
"Challenges in pricing preliminaries costs for contractors: An Australian case study,"
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 137-153.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:126-142:n:1008
DOI: 10.2478/otmcj-2025-0008
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:126-142:n:1008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.