Author
Listed:
- Sai Kalyan B. Hemanth
(Department of Civil Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, 603203, India)
- Anandh S.
(Department of Civil Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, 603203, India)
- Sindhu Nachiar S.
(Department of Civil Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, 603203, India)
Abstract
The construction industry over the years has seen changes and advancements in almost all areas such as planning, execution, etc. However, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an important aspect with regard to the dispute mitigation process, which still needs to be implemented in a full-fledged manner. It is, therefore, important to gather the perspectives of all the stakeholders involved in the process of the dispute resolution for a wholesome understanding. The present study focuses on the stakeholders’ understanding of ADR. This provides a deeper knowledge of what is the trend among the stakeholders and how different is the variation regarding ADR among different groups of stakeholders. The data collected through a questionnaire from 191 participants is taken for statistical analysis to understand the areas that need attention. The findings from this study highlight the minimal knowledge of ADR among the stakeholders. Furthermore, ANOVA is used to understand the correlation among the research questions. The data set consisted of five independent variables (Likert scale ratings) and three dependent variables. Ordinary least square (OLS), a regression technique, is used to predict each of the three descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation [SD] and variance). A significant correlation between the mean, SD and variance was observed. A higher R2 value obtained through analysis also highlights the accuracy of the prediction. For dispute mitigation in the construction industry, findings suggest that improvements in policy making and creating awareness are the key aspects for successful ADR implementation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:otamic:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:1-23:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.