Author
Listed:
- Pejić Bach Mirjana
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Croatia)
- Palić Mirko
(University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Croatia)
- Šimičević Vanja
(University of Libertas, Zagreb, Croatia)
Abstract
Background/Purpose ChatGPT’s rapid diffusion has transformed large-language-model (LLM) technology from a specialist tool into a mainstream companion for study and work. However, empirical evidence on what drives user satisfaction outside medical settings remains scarce. Focusing on future business and management professionals in Croatia, this study examines how perceived ease of use and perceived reliability shape satisfaction with ChatGPT and whether those effects differ between Generation Z (18–25 years) and Generation Y (26–35 years). Methodology An online survey administered in August 2024 yielded 357 valid responses. The measurement model met rigorous reliability and validity criteria (CFI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.04). Results Structural-equation modelling showed that, in the pooled sample, ease of use (β = 0.42) and reliability (β = 0.46) jointly explained 72 % of satisfaction. Multi-group analysis revealed a generational split: both predictors were significant for Gen Z. However, only reliability remained significant for Gen Y. Gaussian graphical models corroborated these findings, indicating a densely interconnected attitude network for younger users and a reliability-centred network for older users. Conclusion The study extends technology-acceptance research to the management domain, underscores the moderating role of generation and illustrates the value of combining SEM with network analytics. Insights inform designers and educators aiming to foster informed, responsible and gratifying engagement with generative AI.
Suggested Citation
Pejić Bach Mirjana & Palić Mirko & Šimičević Vanja, 2025.
"The Impact of Usability and Reliability on ChatGPT Satisfaction among Gen Z and Gen Y,"
Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 58(3), pages 211-226.
Handle:
RePEc:vrs:organi:v:58:y:2025:i:3:p:211-226:n:1001
DOI: 10.2478/orga-2025-0013
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:organi:v:58:y:2025:i:3:p:211-226:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.