IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v38y2022i4p1177-1203n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Holzberg Jessica
  • Katz Jonathan

    (Center for Behavioral Science Methods, U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington D.C., 20233, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Minimizing respondent survey burden may help decrease nonresponse and increase data quality, but the measurement of burden has varied widely. Recent efforts have paid more attention to respondents’ subjective perceptions of burden, measured through the addition of questions to a survey. Despite reliance on these questions as key measures, little qualitative research has been conducted for household surveys. This study used focus groups to examine respondents’ reactions to possible sources of burden in the American Community Survey (ACS) such as survey length, sensitivity, and contact strategy; respondents’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about burden; and overall perceptions of burden. Feedback was used to guide subsequent selection and cognitive testing of questions on subjective perceptions of burden. Generally, respondents did not find the ACS to be burdensome. When deciding whether it was burdensome, respondents thought about the process of responding to the questionnaire, the value of the data, that response is mandatory, and to a lesser extent, the contacts they received, suggesting these constructs are key components of burden in the ACS. There were some differences by response mode and household characteristics. Findings reinforce the importance of conducting qualitative research to ensure questions capture important respondent burden perceptions for a particular survey.

Suggested Citation

  • Holzberg Jessica & Katz Jonathan, 2022. "Exploring Burden Perceptions of Household Survey Respondents in the American Community Survey," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 38(4), pages 1177-1203, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:38:y:2022:i:4:p:1177-1203:n:11
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2022-0050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2022-0050
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2022-0050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:38:y:2022:i:4:p:1177-1203:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.