IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v32y2016i2p461-486n12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modernizing a Major Federal Government Survey: A Review of the Redesign of the Current Population Survey Health Insurance Questions

Author

Listed:
  • Pascale Joanne

    (Center for Survey Measurement, US Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20233, U.S.A.)

Abstract

Measurement error can be very difficult to assess and reduce. While great strides have been made in the field of survey methods research in recent years, many ongoing federal surveys were initiated decades ago, before testing methods were fully developed. However, the longer a survey is in use, the more established the time series becomes, and any change to a questionnaire risks a break in that time series. This article documents how a major federal survey – the health insurance module of the Current Population Survey (CPS) – was redesigned over the course of 15 years through a systematic series of small, iterative tests, both qualitative and quantitative. This overview summarizes those tests and results, and illustrates how particular questionnaire design features were identified as problematic, and how improvements were developed and evaluated. While the particular topic is health insurance, the general approach (a coordinated series of small tests), along with the specific tests and methods employed, are not uniquely applicable to health insurance. Furthermore, the particular questionnaire design features of the CPS health module that were found to be most problematic are used in many other major surveys on a range of topic areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Pascale Joanne, 2016. "Modernizing a Major Federal Government Survey: A Review of the Redesign of the Current Population Survey Health Insurance Questions," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(2), pages 461-486, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:2:p:461-486:n:12
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2016-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2016-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:32:y:2016:i:2:p:461-486:n:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.