IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v31y2015i3p397-414n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using the Bootstrap to Account for Linkage Errors when Analysing Probabilistically Linked Categorical Data

Author

Listed:
  • Chipperfield James O.

    (Australian Bureau of Statistics, Methodology Division, P O Box 10, Belconnen, Australian Capital Territory 2616 Australia)

  • Chambers Raymond L.

    (University of Wollongong, National Institute for Applied Statistics Research, Northfields Avenue Wollongong, New South Wales, 2500 Australia)

Abstract

Record linkage is the act of bringing together records that are believed to belong to the same unit (e.g., person or business) from two or more files. Record linkage is not an error-free process and can lead to linking a pair of records that do not belong to the same unit. This occurs because linking fields on the files, which ideally would uniquely identify each unit, are often imperfect. There has been an explosion of record linkage applications, particularly involving government agencies and in the field of health, yet there has been little work on making correct inference using such linked files. Naively treating a linked file as if it were linked without errors can lead to biased inferences. This article develops a method of making inferences for cross tabulated variables when record linkage is not an error-free process. In particular, it develops a parametric bootstrap approach to estimation which can accommodate the sophisticated probabilistic record linkage techniques that are widely used in practice (e.g., 1-1 linkage). The article demonstrates the effectiveness of this method in a simulation and in a real application.

Suggested Citation

  • Chipperfield James O. & Chambers Raymond L., 2015. "Using the Bootstrap to Account for Linkage Errors when Analysing Probabilistically Linked Categorical Data," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 31(3), pages 397-414, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:31:y:2015:i:3:p:397-414:n:4
    DOI: 10.1515/jos-2015-0024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0024
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jos-2015-0024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:31:y:2015:i:3:p:397-414:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.