IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/offsta/v30y2014i4p24n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Length of Fielding Period Matter? Examining Response Scores of Early Versus Late Responders

Author

Listed:
  • Sigman Richard
  • Yount Naomi Dyer

    (Westat, 1600 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850 U.S.A.)

  • Lewis Taylor
  • Lee Kimya

    (U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20415, U.S.A.)

Abstract

This article discusses the potential effects of a shortened fielding period on an employee survey’s item and index scores and respondent demographics. Using data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s 2011 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey, we investigate whether early responding employees differ from later responding employees. Specifically, we examine differences in item and index scores related to employee engagement and global satisfaction. Our findings show that early responders tend to be less positive, even after adjusting their weights for nonresponse. Agencies vary in their prevalence of late responders, and score differences become magnified as this proportion increases. We also examine the extent to which early versus late responders differ on demographic characteristics such as grade level, supervisory status, gender, tenure with agency, and intention to leave, noting that nonminorities and females are the two demographic characteristics most associated with responding early.

Suggested Citation

  • Sigman Richard & Yount Naomi Dyer & Lewis Taylor & Lee Kimya, 2014. "Does the Length of Fielding Period Matter? Examining Response Scores of Early Versus Late Responders," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 30(4), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:24:n:5
    DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0042
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jos-2014-0042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:offsta:v:30:y:2014:i:4:p:24:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.