IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/msudev/v10y2018i2p17-20n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management of Microbiological Quality of Meat in the Context of Rapid Tenderization

Author

Listed:
  • Stegarus Diana Ionela

    (National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies - ICSIRamnicu Valcea, Romania)

  • Panaitescu Magda

    (Universidad ”Latina” de Panama,Panama, City, Rep. de Panama)

  • Lengyel Ecaterina

    (Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu,Sibiu, Romania)

  • Simion Aurel

    (S.C. AVI-GIIS S.R.L.,Ramnicu Valcea, Romania)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the study of the microbiological load of pork and beef meat, in the context of utilising fast methods of tenderizing them. The study highlights, through both classic and fast methods, the microbial load of fresh, salted and smoked pork and beef meat. It has been established that fresh pork is at around 7,2x104-8,5x104CFU/g, whereas fresh beef sits at around 2,3x103 CFU/g. For salted, smoked and classically tenderized, these values are between 3,3x104 CFU/g and 4,7x104CFU/g for pork and 6,1x102 CFU/g for beef. The method of rapid tenderizing leads to highlighting a decreased microbial load: 2,2x103 CFU/g-5,4x103CFU/g for pork, 2,8x102 CFU/g for beef, which constitute a huge advantage in the value and management of these products. From the point of view of contaminated pathogenic bacteria, the Vidas tests have shown their complete absence. As a conclusion, it can be said that fast methods of tenderization lead to a reduced development of microorganisms, which undoubtedly contributes to their microbiological quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Stegarus Diana Ionela & Panaitescu Magda & Lengyel Ecaterina & Simion Aurel, 2018. "Management of Microbiological Quality of Meat in the Context of Rapid Tenderization," Management of Sustainable Development, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 17-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:msudev:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:17-20:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/msd-2019-0003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/msd-2019-0003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/msd-2019-0003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:msudev:v:10:y:2018:i:2:p:17-20:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.