IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mjsosc/v8y2017i6p91-98n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Congregation of the Condemned: Decades of Discontinuous Debates on Death by Design in Southern Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Obarisiagbon Barr. Emmanuel Imuetinyan

    (Ph.D Dept. of Sociology & Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria)

Abstract

The application of death penalty has been a subject of heated arguments amongst scholars, human right proponents and Christian religious leaders. Although several nations the world over have abrogated its use, Nigeria still has death penalty deeply entrenched in its statute books. In spite of this, capital offences are still on the increase thus calling to question, its relevance as a form of deterrent. The study utilised the functionalist theory.The design was exploratory and involved the use of qualitative methods of data collection. Three states: Edo, Delta and Anambra in southern Nigeria were purposively selected due to high incidence of the commission of capital offences in the locations. 1200 questionnaires were administered to respondents, 30 in-depth interviews and 15 key informant interviews were conducted. A descriptive analysis of the quantitative data collected was undertaken using frequency distribution while the manual content analysis was used for qualitative data collected from the field work. Findings from this investigation showed that death penalty does not in any way deter would-be criminals from committing crime. Based on the findings of the study, government rather than eliminating criminals should instead focus more on their rehabilitation and also use its enormous power and resources to redress some of the inequalities and injustice that characterize our society which is often the cause of crime.

Suggested Citation

  • Obarisiagbon Barr. Emmanuel Imuetinyan, 2017. "Congregation of the Condemned: Decades of Discontinuous Debates on Death by Design in Southern Nigeria," Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 8(6), pages 91-98, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mjsosc:v:8:y:2017:i:6:p:91-98:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/mjss-2017-0045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mjss-2017-0045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mjss-2017-0045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mjsosc:v:8:y:2017:i:6:p:91-98:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.