IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mjsosc/v8y2017i5p73-83n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Special Status Conundrum and the Problem of Rehabilitation in Jammu and Kashmir

Author

Listed:
  • Singh Moksha

    (Assistant Professor, Dept of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India)

  • Jha Munmun

    (Professor of Sociology, Dept of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India)

Abstract

The political crisis in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, following the partition of the sub-continent, resulted in state-society construction that was embedded in religious, ethnic and ideological lines. Coupled with specially designed legislative and political framework, the final status of the state was marred with inbuilt ambiguities. The latter subsequently provided a foundation for further political destabilization in the region. The present contention on the status of Jammu and Kashmir within the Indian union is the outcome of one such temporary political adjustment that was implemented in the state in the form of Article 370 of the Constitution of India. This, over the years, has resulted in political upheaval, growth of secessionist feelings and violence in the state. The relief and rehabilitation of those affected by the conflict have suffered at the hands of this political adjustment. Article 370 does not allow for the implementation of various central government laws and policies in the state, preventing many from receiving the much deserved state and central government aid. This paper proposes that under Section 9 of the State’s Constitution, changes should be brought about in this political adjustment so that there is an all inclusive policy on rehabilitation, ending the conundrum over who is benefitted and who is not.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh Moksha & Jha Munmun, 2017. "The Special Status Conundrum and the Problem of Rehabilitation in Jammu and Kashmir," Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 8(5), pages 73-83, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mjsosc:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:73-83:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/mjss-2017-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mjss-2017-0025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mjss-2017-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mjsosc:v:8:y:2017:i:5:p:73-83:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.