IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/jmaeth/v8y2020i1p1-12n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aus der Not geboren oder sinnvolle Substitution? Chancen und Grenzen des Einsatzes von „Pflegerobotern“ in der stationären Altenpflege aus ethischer Sicht

Author

Listed:
  • Giesbers Markus

    (Dipl. Theol., Dipl. Soz-päd. Master of Business Administration in Medical Management, Fachbereich Sozialwesen, Fachhochschule Münster, Deutschland)

Abstract

This article deals with a differentiated examination of robotics and its evaluation in inpatient geriatric care. It examines the extent to which nursing robots fit into person-centered nursing work and possibly change it significantly. The advantages and new possibilities are shown, but also the dangers and problems from the point of view of different area ethics are pointed out. In the centre of the considerations are residents and employees as a benchmark for the ethical evaluation of robots in geriatric care.

Suggested Citation

  • Giesbers Markus, 2020. "Aus der Not geboren oder sinnvolle Substitution? Chancen und Grenzen des Einsatzes von „Pflegerobotern“ in der stationären Altenpflege aus ethischer Sicht," Journal for Markets and Ethics, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:jmaeth:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1-12:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/jome-2020-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jome-2020-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jome-2020-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:jmaeth:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:1-12:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.