IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/hjobpa/v14y2023i1p12-21n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional and Chaos Theory: Compared and Contrasted

Author

Listed:
  • Spano Dominick

    (1 Florida Atlantic University, Dorothy F. Schmidt College of Arts and Letters, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, Florida, 33431, USA)

Abstract

Institutional and Chaos Theory are frameworks in organizational behavior that have existed for many years. Given their long-term popularity in said field, it is important to have a strong working knowledge of each theory and be able to compare and contrast them. Both theories are wholly applicable to current world happenings, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter movement. By inspecting this paper, readers will learn about Institutional and Chaos Theory, be able to identify how they relate to timely world occurrences, discover their implications in regard to public policy and public administrations, and reflect upon how they can be useful in respect to other organizational and global matters.

Suggested Citation

  • Spano Dominick, 2023. "Institutional and Chaos Theory: Compared and Contrasted," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 12-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:12-21:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/hjbpa-2023-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:hjobpa:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:12-21:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.