IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gosmin/v33y2017i4p107-123n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mercury in grain size fractions of aggregates and extractive waste from hard coal mining

Author

Listed:
  • Klojzy-Karczmarczyk Beata

    (Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

Hard coal production is closely linked to the generation of significant quantities of extractive waste that require further use, in practice recognized as waste or as a raw material. It is therefore important to seek further or improve existing methods of waste material management. Studies conducted in earlier works have shown that it is possible to obtain a low-sulfur grain size fraction (grain class) so that it can be used in excavations requiring reclamation by filling. The purpose of the research presented in this paper is to determine the mercury content in hard coal mining by-products. The presence of mercury in the waste material is known and documented in the literature. However, the level of the content of this element in aggregates or wastes is important. This paper presents the problem of determining the minimum size of rock fractions meeting the specified limits for mercury content above which the material can be considered as safe are used to fill post-mining excavations. The total mercury content was determined using the classical atomic absorption method for all the collected and isolated samples (Altec AMA-254 analyzer). The total mercury content of the samples in the analytical state (Hga) was determined. Laboratory research included waste material directly from production (mining and processing of rock) from the one of the hard coal mine USCB. Coal sludge (silt) (after dewatering on filter presses) and 13 aggregates samples were analyzed, and then separated into 15 grain size fractions. The mercury determination method used in the study allowed its content in the range of 0.0568 to 0.0787 mg/kg, on an average mean of 0.0649 mg/kg (average moisture of the samples - 4.3%). On the other hand, the total mercury content of all the fractions extracted from 13 samples of aggregates showed a high variability in the content of this element, with a noticeabletendency of decreasing mercury content along with the increase in grain size. The average values of the total mercury content decrease from 0.4030 mg/kg for the finest fraction (0-6 mm) to 0.0291 mg/kg for the thickest fraction (120-200 mm) (aggregate sample moisture at approximately 1%). In general, it can be stated that the analyzed samples of coal sludge and grain fractions of aggregates meet the criteria for inert mining waste with respect to the mercury content. Based on the studies conducted, it can be concluded that due to the presence of mercury there is no need to discard fine fractions from aggregates. However, the removal of waste rock material less than 8 mm significantly increases the quality of the material. The obtained results and the statistical analysis clearly indicate a strong correlation between the occurrence of mercury and total sulfur in the material (R2 linear coefficient of determination at 0.9151), where no weathering has yet occurred. In the case of weathering, however, there is no correlation between the occurrence of mercury and sulfur, which may be due to the differences in the processes that govern the transformation and migration of mercury and sulfur compounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Klojzy-Karczmarczyk Beata, 2017. "Mercury in grain size fractions of aggregates and extractive waste from hard coal mining," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 33(4), pages 107-123, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:107-123:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/gospo-2017-0048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/gospo-2017-0048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/gospo-2017-0048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:33:y:2017:i:4:p:107-123:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.