IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gosmin/v29y2013i4p5-24n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The problem of developing prospective hard coal deposits from the point of view of social and environmental conflicts with the use of AHP method

Author

Listed:
  • Sobczyk Eugeniusz J.

    (Ph.D.Sc., professor IGSMiE PAN, Mineral Energy and Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland)

  • Badera Jaroslaw

    (Ph.D., Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec, Poland)

Abstract

In the recent years numerous socio-environmental conflicts have been reported in Poland and other European countries in relation to the development of new or reopening of abandoned mineral deposits. This paper examines possibilities of predicting which of the specified deposits are relatively less contentious with regard to the local social determinants. As the conducted research showed, the multi-criteria decision-making AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method can be successfully used to fulfill this goal. It allows for creating a preliminary ranking of selected deposits in terms of the risk of objections from the local mining stakeholders. As the example of the Ooewiêcim-Polanka deposit shows, an analysis of this kind also allows for comparing selected parts of the same area and thus facilitates the choice of optimal variant of its development in space. Further work on adjusting the AHP method to the specificity of mining is recommended so that it can become a useful tool in a decision-making process for public institutions (to make optimal decisions) as well as mining companies (to minimise investment risk).

Suggested Citation

  • Sobczyk Eugeniusz J. & Badera Jaroslaw, 2013. "The problem of developing prospective hard coal deposits from the point of view of social and environmental conflicts with the use of AHP method," Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi / Mineral Resources Management, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 5-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:5-24:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/gospo-2013-0040
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gospo-2013-0040
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gospo-2013-0040?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gosmin:v:29:y:2013:i:4:p:5-24:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.