IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v5y2013i2p8-12n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive, Negative or Not at All? What Drives Consumers to Post (Accurate) Product Reviews?

Author

Listed:
  • Moe Wendy W.

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, U.S.)

  • Schweidel David A.

    (Goizueta Business School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.)

Abstract

Online consumer reviews are a convenient, valuable pool of information for potential buyers as well as for marketers. But how reliable is this information? A closer look at the motives behind posted product reviews shows that online opinions should indeed be interpreted with care. The study results reveal that the composition of the customer base can exert a substantial influence on the posted online opinion. Due to selection bias and adjustment effects over time, the content posted may not necessarily reflect the customer base’s overall opinion of the product. Individuals were more likely to submit ratings when they were either very satisfied or not satisfied. In addition, consumers were more likely to post an opinion when the ratings already posted were more positive. Highly engaged consumers who frequently post their opinions tend to be more negative than less-engaged individuals. Even though decision-makers can gain valuable insights from the analysis of this pool of information, they should not rely on this source exclusively.

Suggested Citation

  • Moe Wendy W. & Schweidel David A., 2013. "Positive, Negative or Not at All? What Drives Consumers to Post (Accurate) Product Reviews?," GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 8-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:8-12:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:8-12:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.