IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/gfkmir/v4y2012i2p32-41n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sibling Rivalry: Estimating Cannibalization Rates for Innovations

Author

Listed:
  • van Heerde Harald J.

    (University of Waikato, New Zealand)

  • Srinivasan Shuba

    (Boston University School of Management, USA)

  • Dekimpe Marnik G.

    (Tilburg University, The Netherlands / Catholic University Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

To evaluate the success of a new product, managers need to determine how much of its new demand is due to cannibalizing the company’s other products, rather than drawing from competition or generating primary demand. A new model allows managers to estimate cannibalization effects and to calculate the new product’s net demand, which may be considerably less than its total demand. The new methodology is applied to the introduction of the Lexus RX 300 using detailed car transaction data. This case is especially interesting since the Lexus RX 300 was the first crossover SUV, implying that its demand could come from both the SUV and the Luxury Sedan categories. As Lexus was active in both categories, there was a double cannibalization potential. Indeed, demand is shown to originate from different sources and to vary over time. The results contain valuable insights for evaluating and managing brand extensions.

Suggested Citation

  • van Heerde Harald J. & Srinivasan Shuba & Dekimpe Marnik G., 2012. "Sibling Rivalry: Estimating Cannibalization Rates for Innovations," GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, Sciendo, vol. 4(2), pages 32-41, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:32-41:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0033
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/gfkmir-2014-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:gfkmir:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:32-41:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.