IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/finprj/v12y2026i2p25n1001.html

Racial Disparities in Cryptocurrency: A Decomposition Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Di

    (Coastal Carolina University Conway, United States of America)

  • Pearson Blain

    (Auburn University, United States of America)

  • Chen Ying

    (Central Connecticut State University, United States of America)

Abstract

This study investigates racial and ethnic disparities in cryptocurrency (crypto) ownership using data from the 2021 Survey of Household Economics and Decision-Making (SHED). While prior research has explored general determinants of crypto market participation, such as risk tolerance, financial literacy, and investment experience, this study specifically focuses on how these factors differ across racial groups. Using logistic regression and Fairlie decomposition analysis, we find that Black respondents are significantly more likely to invest in crypto compared to White respondents. Key contributors to this disparity include age, financial literacy, risk tolerance, and stock ownership. Notably, while some factors, such as younger age and higher risk tolerance, narrow the participation gap, others, including differences in total savings and stock ownership, widen it. These findings highlight the need for targeted financial education and inclusive investment policies to promote equitable participation in emerging digital financial markets. Implications for financial literacy, consumer protection, and broader economic policy are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Di & Pearson Blain & Chen Ying, 2026. "Racial Disparities in Cryptocurrency: A Decomposition Analysis," Financial Planning Research Journal, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:12:y:2026:i:2:p:25:n:1001
    DOI: 10.2478/fprj-2026-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/fprj-2026-0006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fprj-2026-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:12:y:2026:i:2:p:25:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.