IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/finprj/v11y2025i2p26n1001.html

The Desire for AI Advice in Retirement Plans: A Latent Class Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Bennetts Chet R.

    (The American College of Financial Services, 630 Allendale Road, #400, King of Prussia, PA 19406)

  • Ludwig Eric

    (The American College of Financial Services, 630 Allendale Road, #400, King of Prussia, PA 19406)

Abstract

This study explores employee preferences for generative AI-driven financial advice in employer-sponsored retirement plans using latent class analysis grounded in Rogers's diffusion of innovations theory. Based on a survey of 2,000 public-sector employees, we identify five distinct adoption segments ranging from AI-Integrated Consumers (18.9%) who actively embrace both AI tools and traditional advisors, to Traditionalists (9.1%) who resist both technologies and professional advice. Contrary to expectations that AI adoption would reduce reliance on human advisors, our findings reveal a complementary relationship: employees with the highest AI adoption rates demonstrate 72% engagement with financial professionals compared to only 15% among technology-resistant segments. The analysis reveals that Employer-Driven AI Users (27.7%) represent a critical bridge segment, suggesting workplace-sponsored AI tools can facilitate adoption among employees who might otherwise resist independent AI exploration. Additionally, 40% of employees show low engagement with traditional financial professionals but varying degrees of openness to AI-assisted guidance, indicating significant potential for these tools to serve underserved populations. These findings challenge binary assumptions about AI versus human advice and provide actionable insights for plan sponsors implementing targeted, segment-specific strategies. The results demonstrate that successful AI integration in retirement planning depends on understanding diverse employee preferences and positioning technology as a complement to, rather than replacement for, human expertise in financial decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Bennetts Chet R. & Ludwig Eric, 2025. "The Desire for AI Advice in Retirement Plans: A Latent Class Analysis," Financial Planning Research Journal, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:11:y:2025:i:2:p:26:n:1001
    DOI: 10.2478/fprj-2025-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/fprj-2025-0007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/fprj-2025-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salman Bahoo & Marco Cucculelli & Xhoana Goga & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-46, February.
    2. Dal Bianco, Chiara & Maura, Francesco, 2020. "Education and persistence of earnings shocks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Brenner, Lukas & Meyll, Tobias, 2020. "Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Oriol & Maggie Chen & William Knottenbelt & Iryna Veryzhenko, 2025. "Challenges, Opportunities, and Drivers in Digital Finance [Défis, Opportunités et leviers en Finance Digitale]," Post-Print hal-05236865, HAL.
    2. Mateusz Skwarek, 2025. "Why Do Investors Behave Irrationally in the Cryptocurrency and Emerging Stock Markets?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, July.
    3. Sayem Hossen & Monalisa Moon Joti & Md. Golam Rashed, 2025. "Language of Persuasion and Misrepresentation in Business Communication: A Textual Detection Approach," Papers 2508.09935, arXiv.org.
    4. Bouchra Al MAWLA & George M. El KAZZI & Hiba S. OTHMAN, 2025. "Artificial intelligence as a disruptive force in economics: transformations, challenges, and future prospects," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(643), S), pages 87-106, Summer.
    5. Darko B. Vuković & Senanu Dekpo-Adza & Stefana Matović, 2025. "AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Sara Shafiee & Linda L. Zhang & Kourosh Marjani Rasmussen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Improving Financial Literacy and Supporting Financial Decisions: Developing a Personalized Configurator," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14256-14285, September.
    7. Alexander Erlei & Lukas Meub, 2024. "Reputation-Driven Adoption and Avoidance of Algorithmic Decision Aids in Credence Goods Markets," Papers 2401.17929, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    8. Luo, Haohan & Liu, Xin & Lv, Xingyang & Hu, Yubei & Ahmad, Ali J., 2024. "Investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Ortega Perals, Paula & Maturo, Fabrizio & Cruz Rambaud, Salvador & Sánchez García, Javier, 2025. "The moderating role of government intervention in the relationship between investment in artificial intelligence and the development of financial markets," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Mukta Mani, 2025. "An Exploration of Contemporary Trends in Finance Research," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12291-12316, September.
    11. Boni, Leslie, 2025. "Green-curious retail investors and unmediated interactions with GenAI," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PE).
    12. Maria Gaia Soana & Doriana Cucinelli & Beatrice Ronchini, 2025. "Advisors for micro-entrepreneurs: is one as good as another in accessing alternative finance?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(3), pages 989-1033, March.
    13. Bai, Zefeng, 2021. "Does robo-advisory help reduce the likelihood of carrying a credit card debt? Evidence from an instrumental variable approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    14. Tan Zi Yi & Noor Ashikin Mohd Rom & Nurbani Md. Hassan & Mohamad Shaharudin Samsurijan & Andrew Ebekozien, 2023. "The Adoption of Robo-Advisory among Millennials in the 21st Century: Trust, Usability and Knowledge Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Gaudeul, Alexia & Giannetti, Caterina, 2025. "Beyond Performance: Exploring trade-offs in the design of financial algorithms," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    16. Bogdan Ionut Anghel & Radu Lupu, 2024. "Understanding Regulatory Changes: Deep Learning in Sustainable Finance and Banking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Witold Orzeszko & Dariusz Piotrowski, 2024. "Prediction of robo-advisory acceptance in banking services using tree-based algorithms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Zhong, Xi & She, Jianquan & Wu, Xiaojie, 2024. "Tech for social good: Artificial intelligence and workplace safety," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Hava Orkut & Daria Plotkina, 2026. "Gender-related personality traits and robo-advisor usage intention: the moderating role of gender," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(1), pages 1-12, March.
    20. Marcel Ioan Bolos & Stefan Rusu & Claudia Diana Sabau-Popa & Dana Simona Gherai & Adrian Negrea & Mihai-Ioan Crisan, 2024. "AI Chatbots: Fast Tracking Sustainability Report Analysis for Enhanced Decision Making," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(Special 1), pages 1241-1241, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:finprj:v:11:y:2025:i:2:p:26:n:1001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.