IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecothe/v58y2020i4p517-527n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justification of the Usury Contract in the Law of the Republic of Serbia: Advantages and Disadvantages

Author

Listed:
  • Praštalo Tanja

    (Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia)

Abstract

A usury contract is a null and void contract whereby someone, using the condition of another’s misfortune or material hardship, lack of experience, recklessness, or dependency, obtains for himself or for a third party a benefit that is clearly disproportionate to what he or she has given or done in return or committed to give or do. The usury contract violates one of the basic principles of the law of obligations, which is the principle of equality of obligations, in other words, the equality of the value of mutual benefits of the contracting parties. Although the legal definition of the usury contracts (Law on Contracts and Torts, Article 141, paragraph 1) is comprehensive enough, it is not easy for the courts to decide whether one contract is usury or not, i.e. null and void. The subject of this paper is the analysis of the usury contracts through the current case law in the context of the justification of the existence of this institute in the legislation of Serbia, having in mind the division of opinions, and because as much as a party using a person’s difficult material situation is presented in a negative context, the contract of this type is nonetheless a product of the willing action of both parties. The topic of this paper is very sensitive and requires a reasoned methodological approach and analysis. The aim of the paper is also to encourage the affected party in the usury contract to enter into litigation to protect their rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Praštalo Tanja, 2020. "Justification of the Usury Contract in the Law of the Republic of Serbia: Advantages and Disadvantages," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 58(4), pages 517-527, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:517-527:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/ethemes-2020-0029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ethemes-2020-0029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecothe:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:517-527:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.