IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v17y2025i3p65-82n1004.html

Assessment of product quality risks by qualimetric methods using functionally dependent statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Trishch Roman

    (National Aerospace University “Kharkiv, Aviation Institute”, 17 Vadym Manko st., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine, Mykolas Romeris University, 20 Ateities st., Vilnius, Lithuania.)

  • Petraškevičius Vladislavas

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 11 Saulėtekio al., 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Šimelytė Agnė

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 11 Saulėtekio al., 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Cherniak Olena

    (National Aerospace University “Kharkiv, Aviation Institute”, 17 Vadym Manko st., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Lomanov Kostiantyn

    (V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody sq., 61022 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

In modern production systems, ensuring high product quality while minimising risk is a critical challenge. Traditional quality assessment methods often rely on expert judgment or complex models, which may introduce subjectivity or require large datasets. This study aims to develop a universal methodology for assessing product quality risks using a mathematically grounded approach that eliminates the need for expert-based evaluations and can be easily implemented in various industrial contexts. A qualimetric method based on nonlinear mathematical dependence using the error function “erf” is proposed. The method transforms measured quality indicators into a dimensionless scale and derives functionally dependent statistics under the assumption of a uniform distribution. The model is validated through analytical derivations and numerical experiments on piston components in precision mechanical engineering. A new mathematical model was established to calculate the probability density function of transformed quality indicators. The methodology enables the estimation of the probability that a quality indicator will fall within a risky range near tolerance limits. Numerical experiments confirmed the validity of the model, demonstrating its applicability to real-world production scenarios and its alignment with known principles of qualimetry. The proposed method provides a universal, objective, and practical tool for risk-based quality assessment. It can be applied across different industries, integrated into existing quality management systems, and used to support decision-making in production control. Future research should expand the model to accommodate nonuniform distributions and explore its integration with real-time quality monitoring systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Trishch Roman & Petraškevičius Vladislavas & Šimelytė Agnė & Cherniak Olena & Lomanov Kostiantyn, 2025. "Assessment of product quality risks by qualimetric methods using functionally dependent statistics," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 17(3), pages 65-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:65-82:n:1004
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2025-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2025-0020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2025-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kilström, Matilda & Roth, Paula, 2024. "Risk-sharing and entrepreneurship," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 341-360.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sundriyal, Vivek Kumar & Gabrielsson, Jonas, 2024. "The employment consequences of founding an incorporated business among STEM founders: Evidence from Swedish microdata," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:65-82:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.