IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecoman/v11y2019i4p34-42n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validating a destructive measurement system using Gauge R&R — a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma Mithun
  • Sahni Sanjeev P.
  • Sharma Shilpi

    (O.P. Jindal Global University, SonipatIndia)

Abstract

The research study aims to evaluate the precision of the measurement system using Gauge R&R. An experimental research design adopting a positivist empirical approach with deductive strategy was followed to assess the effectiveness of Crossed Gauge R&R technique for validating a measurement system using destructive testing. Crossed Gauge R&R technique in Minitab was found to be highly effective in quantifying different components of measurement variation relative to process variation. Clue generation from the Crossed Gauge R&R study combined with manufacturing and measurement process know-how helped in identifying and eliminating the root causes for measurement variation. Overall Crossed Gauge R&R proved successful in validating the burst strength test equipment. However, it should be noted that manufacturing and test equipment played an equally important part in developing and executing the gauge R&R study and accurately analysing the results. So, Crossed Gauge R&R should be used as an aid rather than the solution for measurement system validation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma Mithun & Sahni Sanjeev P. & Sharma Shilpi, 2019. "Validating a destructive measurement system using Gauge R&R — a case study," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 11(4), pages 34-42, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:34-42:n:3
    DOI: 10.2478/emj-2019-0031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0031
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/emj-2019-0031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecoman:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:34-42:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.