IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaeuco/v25y2019i1p171-194n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community School Model: Is It an Alternative for School Closures in Rural Territories?

Author

Listed:
  • Supule Inese

    (Institute of Sociology and Philosophy, University of Latvia)

Abstract

In the light of rural depopulation and a decreasing number of schoolchildren, municipalities with rural territories face a question regarding whether to close small rural schools or seek alternatives for school operation. The analysis of a quantitative survey of rural municipalities and rural schools is focused on these main questions: what are the extended functions of rural schools with pupils less than 100, and whether the community school model in rural municipalities may be considered as an alternative to school closures in the context of depopulation of rural territories. The results of quantitative surveys are supplemented and explained by the data of 58 in-depth interviews with different stakeholders, living or working in rural areas. The main findings show that rural schools and municipalities positively evaluate the approach of community schools with extended functions, and partly it is an adaptation strategy for the diminishing number of pupils. However, extended functions and the community school model do not serve as an important argument for keeping a school open, but as a means for attracting pupils from neighbouring municipalities, and is a form of competition between municipalities. The article is prepared with funding from the EEA/Norwegian Financial Mechanism 2009–2014 under Project Contract n° NFI/R/2014/014.

Suggested Citation

  • Supule Inese, 2019. "Community School Model: Is It an Alternative for School Closures in Rural Territories?," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 171-194, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:171-194:n:7
    DOI: 10.12775/eec.2019.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.12775/eec.2019.007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12775/eec.2019.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:25:y:2019:i:1:p:171-194:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.