IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaeuco/v19y2013ip127-151n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tradition and Modernity in the Romanian Rural Space. Case Study: the Arges Sub-Carpathian Foothills

Author

Listed:
  • Manea Gabriela
  • Matei Elena
  • Vijulie Iuliana
  • Marin Marian
  • Cocos Octavian
  • Tiscovschi Adrian

Abstract

This paper intends to demonstrate on the basis of a case study that rural people’s access to modern goods and services is not necessarily a relentless source of deculturalisation, because it sometimes allows a better management and valorisation of the main characteristics of the rural space. Despite socio-economic unrest and successive changes of political regimes that took place in Romania during the last century, the human communities within the Arges foothills have defended with dignity their traditional material and spiritual values, passing them down from generation to generation. In the medium and long-term, the valorisation of the Romanian rural space, in general, and of that belonging to the Arges foothills, in particular, will imply the creation of a balance between the valuable cultural potential and the quality of life of the inhabitants, who are the keepers of rural cultural heritage. At present, the best thing to do to pass on the traditions of this area is to proudly accept the affiliation to this geographical space. This is true not only for the permanent inhabitants of rural settlements, but mostly for those who have left the countryside to carry it in their minds and souls. In our opinion, this fact is a pre-requisite for preventing the loss of material and spiritual values of this cultural-historical space.

Suggested Citation

  • Manea Gabriela & Matei Elena & Vijulie Iuliana & Marin Marian & Cocos Octavian & Tiscovschi Adrian, 2013. "Tradition and Modernity in the Romanian Rural Space. Case Study: the Arges Sub-Carpathian Foothills," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 19, pages 127-151, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:19:y:2013:i::p:127-151:n:6
    DOI: 10.2478/eec-2013-0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/eec-2013-0007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:19:y:2013:i::p:127-151:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.