IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cusecp/v5y2025i1p143-155n1010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religious Violence in Late Antiquity between Facts and Ideology. The Case of Quodvultdeus of Carthage

Author

Listed:
  • Anghel Silviu

    (University of Bucharest, 4-12 Regina Elisabeta Blvd, 030018 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Religious violence has been an essential factor in many of our societies for thousands of years. The rise of fundamentalism and coercion of others based on religious beliefs is a recurring phenomenon. The present paper analyzes key texts from Late Antiquity that relate episodes of religiously motivated violence: the story of the destruction of the Serapeum in Alexandria in 391 CE, as related by the Church historian Rufinus, and the destruction of the Carthaginian temple of Caelestis, as related by the bishop and Church writer Quodvultdeus. The paper argues that these religiously motivated destructions are not as straightforward as they seem at first sight. Rufinus’ description interprets the events through the prism of Old Testament prophecies about the fall of pagan gods and their statues. His vision is teleological and sees the event through a series of stages derived from Scripture: the triumph of Christianity, followed by the hiding and then destruction of pagan idols. By forcing these elements into the destruction of the Serapeum, he turns a local political and religious conflict into a world-encompassing fulfillment of prophecy. The Carthaginian bishop Quodvultdeus not only believed in the fulfillment of the same prophecies but also in emulating the events of the Serapeum. The destruction of the temple of Caelestis, an imposing but abandoned structure, is turned into the second fall of the Serapeum. Through the analysis of the vocabulary employed by Rufinus and Quodvultdeus, as well as parallels with other testimonies, this paper discusses and reframes these lenses.

Suggested Citation

  • Anghel Silviu, 2025. "Religious Violence in Late Antiquity between Facts and Ideology. The Case of Quodvultdeus of Carthage," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 143-155.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cusecp:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:143-155:n:1010
    DOI: 10.2478/csep-2025-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/csep-2025-0010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/csep-2025-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cusecp:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:143-155:n:1010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.