IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/caeeur/v11y2017i1p27-44n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Went Wrong in the Cyprus Negotiations? The Three Elements That Led to Failure

Author

Listed:
  • Stelgias Niko

    (Department of New Media and Communication in the Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa, Cyprus)

Abstract

In the wake of the interruption of the negotiations in mid-2017, this study aims to investigate and underline the reasons that led to the new failure in the Cyprus talks. Why did the negotiations collapse after a remarkable two-year effort? Who were the main protagonists in this fiasco? What were the main points of disagreement at the negotiations’ table? What were the disputes in the fields of security and equality? What was the role of local society in the failure? This analysis attempts to answer the questions mentioned above by putting the official positions of the two sides and the related opinion articles and publications which have had an impact on the Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot press, under its microscope.

Suggested Citation

  • Stelgias Niko, 2017. "What Went Wrong in the Cyprus Negotiations? The Three Elements That Led to Failure," Central and Eastern European Review, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 27-44, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:caeeur:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:27-44:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/caeer-2018-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/caeer-2018-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/caeer-2018-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:caeeur:v:11:y:2017:i:1:p:27-44:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.