IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/brcebe/v1y2015i1p9n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study Regarding Teaching Design for Quality at Graduate Level

Author

Listed:
  • Dragomir Mihai

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Dragomir Diana

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Popescu Sorin

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Bodi Ştefan

    (Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This paper presents a case study regarding the methods used in teaching Design for quality at graduate studies level, in order to help practitioners derive enhancement ideas for their own demarches in related fields. The methodology consists in surveying existing experiences in the Quality engineering and management master program at the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca in a comparative study and defining a set of criteria for analyzing them. The two options of delivering the targeted competences, which have equivalent content, rely on different teaching approaches: classical for one group and computer aided for the second group. With the help of a focus group, the investigation criteria are defined and ranked using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process), while Pugh’s method is further used to detail the proposed comparison. A discussion on the results of the two scenarios is included, showcasing advantages and disadvantages, together with implementation suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragomir Mihai & Dragomir Diana & Popescu Sorin & Bodi Ştefan, 2015. "Case Study Regarding Teaching Design for Quality at Graduate Level," Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sciendo, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:9:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/cplbu-2015-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/cplbu-2015-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/cplbu-2015-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:brcebe:v:1:y:2015:i:1:p:9:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.