IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjrecm/v6y2018i1p175-192n14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Cost Estimation Techniques in Drc Valuation: A Comparative Assessment of Valuers and Quantity Surveyors in Lagos State

Author

Listed:
  • Aihie Vincent Uwaifiokun

    (Department of Estate Management, University of Benin,Benin City, Nigeria)

  • Ikuabe Matthew

    (Department of Quantity Surveying, University of Benin,Benin City, Nigeria)

Abstract

The aim of the research is to comparatively assess the knowledge and competency levels among valuers and quantity surveyors of cost estimation techniques used in DRC valuation. The study investigates the need for estate surveyors and valuers in Nigeria to improve their current knowledge of cost estimation techniques when valuing non-rent yielding and specialized properties using the DRC method of valuation. More importantly, it evaluates the need for valuers to engage in the services of quantity surveyors in order to ensure that accurate cost estimates are provided for use in the valuation process. The research methodology adopted in actualizing the aim of the present study made use of primary and secondary sources of data, which included texts, published research work and semi-structured questionnaire. Identical questionnaire was distributed to both valuers and quantity surveyors in Lagos and their responses were measured using statistical tables and simple percentages. A proficiency scale of the National Institute of Health was adopted to test the level of competence of cost estimation techniques amongst valuers and quantity surveyors and their responses were ranked. Furthermore, a two-sample t-test was used to compare the means of random samples drawn from the responses of these two populations. The findings showed that there was a lack of awareness more on the part of valuers than quantity surveyors when it came to the knowledge and use of current cost estimating methods when valuing properties using the DRC method of valuation. These findings also gave credence to the fact that the services of quantity surveyors most times were not commissioned when these cost estimates were to be determined for valuation, hence leading to properties being undervalued or overvalued. In a nutshell, the recommendations postulated dwelt on improving the cost estimating knowledge of estate surveyors and valuers through seminars, symposiums and workshops organised by NIESV and NIQS, awareness of the need for valuers to work with quantity surveyors to perfect valuation briefs involving the use of the DRC method and slight changes made to the curriculum of the study course “Estate Management” in tertiary institutions so as to accommodate taking courses in quantity surveying.

Suggested Citation

  • Aihie Vincent Uwaifiokun & Ikuabe Matthew, 2018. "Evaluation of Cost Estimation Techniques in Drc Valuation: A Comparative Assessment of Valuers and Quantity Surveyors in Lagos State," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 175-192, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:175-192:n:14
    DOI: 10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bjreecm-2018-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olusegun Ogunba, 2011. "Valuers' perceptions of depreciation models in DRC valuations," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 190-209, March.
    2. Peter Wyatt, 2009. "Replacement cost and market value," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 27(6), pages 593-602, September.
    3. Nick French & Laura Gabrielli, 2007. "Market value and depreciated replacement cost: contradictory or complementary?," Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 25(5), pages 515-524, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Copiello Sergio & Bonifaci Pietro, 2018. "Depreciated Replacement Cost: Improving the Method Through a Variant Based on three Cornerstones," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 26(2), pages 33-47, June.
    2. Enrico Fattinnanzi & Giovanna Acampa & Fabrizio Battisti & Orazio Campo & Fabiana Forte, 2020. "Applying the Depreciated Replacement Cost Method When Assessing the Market Value of Public Property Lacking Comparables and Income Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Marta Dell’Ovo & Francesca Torrieri & Alessandra Oppio & Stefano Capolongo & Marco Gola & Andrea Brambilla, 2023. "The Enhancement of Special-Use Real Estate Properties: The Case of Hospital Facilities," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Saeed, Uzma & Arshad, Muhammad & Hayat, Shakeel & Morelli, Toni Lyn & Ali Nawaz, Muhammad, 2022. "Analysis of provisioning ecosystem services and perceptions of climate change for indigenous communities in the Western Himalayan Gurez Valley, Pakistan," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Babatunde Isaiah Olajide, 2018. "Examining Heuristics for Building - Work-in-Progress Valuations in Niger State Nigeria," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 26(2), pages 92-103, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjrecm:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:175-192:n:14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.