IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v6y2016i1p139-156n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating the Risk of Fraud in Documentary Letters of Credit

Author

Listed:
  • Alavi Hamed

    (Tallinn Law School, Tallinn University of Technology Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn 12618, Estonia)

Abstract

Despite the fact that documentary letters of credit (LC) are meant to facilitate the process of international trade, their specific characteristics may increase the risk of fraud while being used as the method of payment in the process of international transaction. Many factors like exclusive use of documents, geographical distance, absence of efficient prosecution, the diversity of legal system at the global level and restricted application of fraud rule can be considered as reasons for LC fraud. While billions of dollars are lost annually due to fraud in the course of LC operations, such vulnerability can result in reducing the global popularity of documentary letters of credit as the main method of payment used in international trade. Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning that fraud risk management is an unexplored territory in the practice of documentary letters of credit operation. Existing research tries to fill the gap in the study on comprehensive methods for mitigating fraud risk in operations with documentary letters of credit by using risk management theory in order to answer the question of how to manage fraud risk in LC transactions? In a quest to answer the research question, the paper is divided into two parts: the first part is dedicated to preventive measures while the latter explores responsive measures of an enterprise to manage fraud risk in LC transactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Alavi Hamed, 2016. "Mitigating the Risk of Fraud in Documentary Letters of Credit," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 139-156, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:139-156:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2016-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2016-0006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2016-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:6:y:2016:i:1:p:139-156:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.