IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v5y2015i2p70-89n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nullity and Other Defects of Administrative Decisions in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Frumarová Kateřina

    (Faculty of Law, Palacký University in Olomouc Tř. 17 listopadu 8, Olomouc 771 11, Czech Republic)

Abstract

This article deals with the issue of administrative decision, which represents one of the principal forms of the realization of public administration in the Czech Republic. Even if the Czech legislation provides for its issuance a number of requirements in relation to its content and form, in practice, however, there are violations of these legal conditions and requirements and then we talk about a defective administrative decision. According to how to remedy the defective administrative acts, distinction is made between formally defective administrative decisions, factually inaccurate decisions, unlawful decisions, and next to them, separately null administrative decisions. The main attention is paid to the nullity, because only the nullity represents the most serious and also irremovable defect of an administrative decision. As the null decision does not exist from the perspective of law, it is not able to affect the rights and duties of its recipients. The null acts, as the only category of defective administrative acts, constitute an exception to the principle of the presumption of validity and correctness of administrative acts.

Suggested Citation

  • Frumarová Kateřina, 2015. "Nullity and Other Defects of Administrative Decisions in the Czech Republic," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 5(2), pages 70-89, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:70-89:n:5
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2015-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2015-0014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2015-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:70-89:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.