IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/bjeust/v10y2020i1p173-194n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Meta’-significance of Scalia’s A Matter of Interpretation: Reflections on a Theory and Ethics of Judicial Legislative Power

Author

Listed:
  • Berkmanas Tomas

    (Faculty of Law, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos 66-215, Kaunas LT-44138, Lithuania)

Abstract

The article focuses on a metatheory of legal interpretation as provided or implied in Antonin Scalia’s famous essay A Matter of Interpretation. It is not so much textualism itself what is being analysed here as its theoretical and philosophical foundations. Following this route, the article reveals a complex ideological framework of intersections between domains of democracy, common law, stare decisis, jusnaturalism and juspositivism. By moving judicial legislative power to the forefront, the analysis opens up the existence of two rather different, if not opposite, legislative strategies in the contemporary government: a regular one, exercised by its political institutions (parliament being the main one), and a specific one, exercised by the judiciary. The article proceeds with a critical analysis of two justifications of the latter—one more formal and another more substantial. Finally, the article develops a basic practical hierarchical structure of principles or rules that should settle down legislative powers by neutralising the apparent fundamental contradiction in Scalia’s essay (i.e., being pro-democrat and pro-liberal at the same time).

Suggested Citation

  • Berkmanas Tomas, 2020. "The ‘Meta’-significance of Scalia’s A Matter of Interpretation: Reflections on a Theory and Ethics of Judicial Legislative Power," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 173-194, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:173-194:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2020-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0009
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bjes-2020-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:bjeust:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:173-194:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.