IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ajinst/v8y2019i1p87-94n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers Scoring and Grading of Students’ Responses to Tasks: The Ghanaian Basic School Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Anane Eric

    (Institute of Education, University of Cape Coast)

  • Adu-Mensah Jephtar

    (Association of African Universities)

Abstract

This paper explored the scoring and grading practices of teachers in basic schools. The study sought to understand the various factors teachers take into account when scoring students’ responses to tasks in the classroom. The stratified sampling procedure was used to select 278 primary and junior high school teachers from whom data were collected for the study. In the descriptive analysis, the results revealed that teachers considered students’ behaviour such as punctuality, interest in subject and neatness of work presented, and number of questions attempted by a student, and awarded marks when grading. These academic and non-academic factors considered by teachers in this study during scoring and grading are consistent with the literature. In independent samples t-test analyses, primary school teachers did not differ significantly from their counterparts in the junior high schools in terms of factors they considered during the scoring and grading of students’ responses to tasks in the classroom. This study adds a circumstantial data to the existing debate on teacher classroom assessment practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Anane Eric & Adu-Mensah Jephtar, 2019. "Teachers Scoring and Grading of Students’ Responses to Tasks: The Ghanaian Basic School Experience," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 87-94, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ajinst:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:87-94:n:9
    DOI: 10.2478/ajis-2019-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2019-0009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ajis-2019-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ajinst:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:87-94:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.