IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ajbals/v10y2024i3p67-75n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expertise act as evidence, accessibility and practical issues according to the Albanian legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Cipa Ardian

    (University of Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

One of the most important pieces of evidence provided by the Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter: CPC), is evidence with an expert, which is taken in cases when the proceeding body for resolving a specific case needs special technical, scientific or cultural knowledge. The lawmaker, as for any evidence provided in the CPC, provides for the notification of the receipt of this evidence to the subject’s party to the criminal proceeding. Even in this case, the evidence with an expert, namely the decision to appoint an expert, will be notified to the subjects of criminal proceedings of the defendant or his defense counsel. The problem encountered in practice regarding this decision is related to the fact that this decision is notified only to the person who holds the status of defendant and is not notified to the person under investigation or the person to whom the criminal offense is attributed. In fact, this attitude taken by the prosecution practice is not in line with the provisions and purpose of the CPC, which provides that the rights of the person under investigation or the person to whom the criminal offense is attributed are equated with the rights of the defendant. In relation to this fact, the Court of General Jurisdiction has taken a different position from the Court of Special Jurisdiction. The Court of General Jurisdiction always notifies the decision to perform the act of expertise to the person under investigation and a completely different position is held by the Court of Special Jurisdiction which notifies the decision to appoint the expert upon receipt of the status of the defendant. Another problematic related precisely to the decision on the notification for the assignment of the expert is his recklessness in the trial process, since the opinions held in practice are different. If we refer to the position of the Court of Special Jurisdiction, it does not declare the act of expertise unnecessary in those cases when the decision to appoint the expert has not been notified to the person under investigation. Following this manuscript, I will also consider extensively the evidence with an expert and the provisions of the CPC on this evidence, together with some concrete cases on the positions held by the jurisdictions of the courts to notify the decision to appoint an expert as subject of criminal proceedings.

Suggested Citation

  • Cipa Ardian, 2024. "Expertise act as evidence, accessibility and practical issues according to the Albanian legislation," Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 67-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ajbals:v:10:y:2024:i:3:p:67-75:n:1006
    DOI: 10.2478/ajbals-2024-0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajbals-2024-0021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ajbals-2024-0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ajbals:v:10:y:2024:i:3:p:67-75:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.