IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ajbals/v10y2024i3p48-56n1004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repetition of judicial review before the court of appeal - Problems encountered in Albanian judicial practice

Author

Listed:
  • Shehaj Enerjeta

    (Administrative Appeal Court of Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

Article 13 of the ECHR provides that: “Every person whose rights and freedoms recognized by this Convention have been violated, has the right to lodge an effective appeal before a national institution even when this violation has been committed by persons acting within the exercise of their official functions”. The right to effective appeal is a fundamental human right and implies the right of the individual to appeal, the existence of a certain body for reviewing the appeal, unconditional acceptance of the appeal for review, reasonable deadlines for its review, an objective review, judicial control, as a final check on the appeal. The Court of Appeal judges as a court the fact and the law and as such it has the its own right but also at the request of the party to partially or fully repeat the judicial review. Article 427, paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been amended recently by the Law 35/2017, whereby it is provided that: “When the defendant is found not guilty, the court of appeal cannot find him guilty solely on the basis of a different assessment of the evidence obtained in the first instance trial”. Based on the grammatical and logical interpretation of this provision, it results that the criminal court of the reviewing jurisdiction cannot declare the defendant innocent by the criminal court of the original jurisdiction, on the basis of the same facts and evidence, but by assessing them differently, guaranteeing this way a provision the respect of the principle of non-compliance with the position of the defendant. But what is put forward for discussion by the practice of the Courts is the fact that the Courts of Appeal have in some cases found the defendant guilty, on the same facts and evidence, on the basis of which he was declared innocent by the court of first instance, after the contrary assessment of the facts and evidence was made by the court of first instance, misinterpreting Article 427/4 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehaj Enerjeta, 2024. "Repetition of judicial review before the court of appeal - Problems encountered in Albanian judicial practice," Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 48-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ajbals:v:10:y:2024:i:3:p:48-56:n:1004
    DOI: 10.2478/ajbals-2024-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajbals-2024-0019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ajbals-2024-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ajbals:v:10:y:2024:i:3:p:48-56:n:1004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.