IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v73y2025i4p31-58n1002.html

Lessons from the changing regulatory boardroom on ‘onboarding’: An Irish perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Murphy Denis

    (Association for Dental Education in Europe, Dublin, Ireland)

  • Watson Derek

    (Faculty of Business, Law and Tourism, University of Sunderland, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Regulation of nursing and midwifery in Ireland experienced an ideological shift with the enactment of the Nurses and Midwives Act 2011. This Act migrated board membership from traditional registrant-led self-regulation, to a non-registrant majority, colloquially ‘the lay-majority’. This paper reviews the experiences of board members on being part of this lay-majority, the concept of board member identity, and members’ experiences of onboarding. Interpretativist in nature, an insider, action research, mixed methods frame was deployed. Findings demonstrate the lay-majority concept was initially contentious for registrants. Data also highlights a disparity between members’ expectations and experienced boardroom realities. Finally, board members’ experiences of onboarding were of a process in need of improvement. The paper concludes by proposing a ‘lifecycle model of regulatory board member onboarding’. This model stresses the importance of board members’ understanding of the regulatory governance frame, and application of sociocultural approaches to learning as key enablers to becoming an effective board member.

Suggested Citation

  • Murphy Denis & Watson Derek, 2025. "Lessons from the changing regulatory boardroom on ‘onboarding’: An Irish perspective," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 73(4), pages 31-58.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:73:y:2025:i:4:p:31-58:n:1002
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2025-0025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2025-0025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2025-0025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:73:y:2025:i:4:p:31-58:n:1002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.