IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vra/lbcs20/y2020i1p338-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For The Failed Digitalization Of The Employment Documentation And The Justice On Labor Disputes And The Damages Suffered By The Society From This

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Aleksandrov

    (Institute for Legal Researches, BAS)

Abstract

Still slow and uncertain, but still tangible, our labor legislation is beginning to recognize the benefits of digitizing labor law documentation - speed, security, economy, etc. The most important step in this direction was the adoption of the Ordinance on the type and requirements for the creation and storage of electronic documents in the employment file of the employee in 2018. However, are the administrative and judicial practice ready for such a "revolution"? From today's point of view, the possible conclusions do not seem promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Aleksandrov, 2020. "For The Failed Digitalization Of The Employment Documentation And The Justice On Labor Disputes And The Damages Suffered By The Society From This," THE LAW AND THE BUSINESS IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY, University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, issue 1, pages 338-346, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vra:lbcs20:y:2020:i:1:p:338-346
    DOI: 10.36997/LBCS2020.338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://conference.ue-varna.bg/pravni-nauki/ConfProceedings/LBCS2020/338-346.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36997/LBCS2020.338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    digitalization; electronic documents in the labor file; electronic justice.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vra:lbcs20:y:2020:i:1:p:338-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavel Petrov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.