IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v68y2021i4p531-554id987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Electoral Institutions and Rules Influencing Proportionality and Partisan Bias in Spanish Politics

Author

Listed:
  • José M. Pavía
  • Fernando Toboso

Abstract

The current paper focuses on the Spanish electoral rules governing political competition for the central “Congreso de los Diputados”. It is well-documented that the system as a whole has traditionally favoured one or the other of the two main political parties (PP and PSOE) at the expense of proportionality and the remaining political parties. This paper focuses on some key Spanish electoral rules and investigates how much the observed biases could be altered by introducing some alternative rules taken from the Swedish electoral system, ceteris paribus. Measures of disproportionality are made through the Loosemore–Hanby index and the Gallagher index. The electoral raw data used for our estimations comes from the 2011, 2015 and 2016 last three Spanish general elections. The basic contribution of the paper is an empirical one as it provides a new example that institutions matter for results. Keywords: Institutions, Institutional changes, Spanish electoral rules, Adapted Swedish electoral rules, Proportionality, Partisan bias, Quantitative estimations. JEL: H0, C1.

Suggested Citation

  • José M. Pavía & Fernando Toboso, 2021. "Key Electoral Institutions and Rules Influencing Proportionality and Partisan Bias in Spanish Politics," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 68(4), pages 531-554.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:68:y:2021:i:4:p:531-554:id:987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/987/670
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutions; Institutional changes; Spanish electoral rules; Adapted Swedish electoral rules; Proportionality; Partisan bias; Quantitative estimations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H0 - Public Economics - - General
    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:68:y:2021:i:4:p:531-554:id:987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.