IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vls/rojfme/v7y2019i1p136-140.html

Social Protection In Romania – Between Necessity And Systemic Efficiency. An Analysis At The Level Of South-Muntenia Region

Author

Listed:
  • BUCUR, Sorinel Ionel

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics, the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

In the context of the multiple structural modifications intervened in Romania, the social policy is in a permanent process of adjusting to the economic realities, as well as with the manifestation, at different intensities and different amplitudes of the forms of social risks which can emerge. Starting from the present differences between the different pannels (national versus regional, intra-regional, or on residence environments ), the present approach is wishing to make an analysis of the efficiency of the the social protection system at the level of one of the biggest regions, respectively the South-Muntenia region, which is re-grouping seven counties with different characteristics, not only from the point of view of the geographical placement, but also of the nature of the activities developed, which are influencing, among others, the local social system.

Suggested Citation

  • BUCUR, Sorinel Ionel, 2019. "Social Protection In Romania – Between Necessity And Systemic Efficiency. An Analysis At The Level Of South-Muntenia Region," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 7(1), pages 136-140, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:136-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.icfm.ro/RePEc/vls/vls_pdf_jfme/vol7i1p136-140.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:136-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Mateescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfiarro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.