IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vls/rojfme/v11y2023i1p92-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence And Key Risk Indicators In Cyber Frauds Prevention

Author

Listed:
  • NITA, Gabriel

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj, Romania)

  • GABUDEANU, Larisa

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj, Romania)

  • CERNAEANU, Cosmin Constantin

    (University of Craiova, Romania)

  • RAICU, Gabriel Margarit

    (Constanta Maritime University, Romania)

  • SCHEAU, Mircea Constantin

    (University of Craiova / Constanta Maritime University, Romania)

Abstract

Due to increasing economical impact due to the cyber fraud phenomenon, payment institutions allocate considerable resources to prevent this. An adequate implementation of risk indicators coupled with preventive mechanisms can lead to a decrease of losses. The protection mechanisms engineered through artificial intelligence could be a proper solution, but there are no specific legal requirements and frameworks for implementation and liability for such tools, aside from general cyber security, data protection and cyber-crime legal provisions. In this article we analyzed the impact of such preventive measures from multiple perspectives, including economical and legal. Our contribution entails a proposal for compliance evaluation of artificial intelligence tools for cyber fraud prevention, monitoring and adjustment thereof through analysis of the key risk indicator evolution over time.

Suggested Citation

  • NITA, Gabriel & GABUDEANU, Larisa & CERNAEANU, Cosmin Constantin & RAICU, Gabriel Margarit & SCHEAU, Mircea Constantin, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence And Key Risk Indicators In Cyber Frauds Prevention," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 11(1), pages 92-111, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:92-111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.icfm.ro/RePEc/vls/vls_pdf_jfme/vol11i1p92-111.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk management; risk-based prioritization; cyber fraud governance; damage prevention; financial protection;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • K24 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Cyber Law
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vls:rojfme:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:92-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniel Mateescu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cfiarro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.