Site Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation
Random Utility Models are commonly used to model the choice among a set of alternatives. Often, due to data or computational constraints, the analyst must use aggregated alternatives to estimate the model. These aggregates are defined by averaging characteristics of alternatives over prespecified groups. In this analysis, we demonstrate that unless some very restrictive conditions hold, the use of aggregated alternatives will lead to biased results. Then, using a data set of recreational fishing in Wisconsin, we show the effects that this bias can have on the results estimated from the model.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:68:y:1992:i:4:p:418-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.