IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v5y1970i1p51-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct Marginal Productivity of College Education in Relation to College Aptitude of Students and Production Costs of Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Andre Daniere
  • Jerry Mechling

Abstract

By combining a variety of data sources, the authors arrive at cautious estimates of expected earnings flows and their present values for students of different college aptitude entering institutions of different "quality." When linked to estimates of alternative earnings and production costs of college education, these figures provide marginal decision criteria for the reallocation (or additional allocation) of resources in college education. A rough policy implication of the benefit-cost ratios is that additional college places should go in preference to students of higher college aptitude and should be created in low-cost institutions. One of the more surprising results is that we apparently have gone too far in the policy, or market outcome, which consists of placing high aptitude students in high quality colleges and lower aptitude students in inferior institutions. These conclusions hold as long as increases in measured national product are the only objective and college expansion is controlled by the amount of funds made available for it. New conclusions emerge if the drag on expansion is associated with tuition and student financial aid policies and, again, if equalization of opportunities enters as an additional objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Andre Daniere & Jerry Mechling, 1970. "Direct Marginal Productivity of College Education in Relation to College Aptitude of Students and Production Costs of Institutions," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 5(1), pages 51-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:5:y:1970:i:1:p:51-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/144624
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:5:y:1970:i:1:p:51-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.