IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating Occupational Attainment in Studies of Male-Female Earnings Differentials


  • Randall S. Brown
  • Marilyn Moon
  • Barbara S. Zoloth


Differences in the occupational distributions of men and women represent an important source of male-female differentials. Yet most studies of wage differences concentrate only on either occupational segregation or the problem of unequal pay for equal work. This study refines and merges these two approaches, allowing for variation both in occupational distribution and in wages resulting from differences in job qualifications and productivity indicators. Our approach uses multinomial logit analysis to predict occupational attainment for men from a set of personal characteristics and then simulates an occupational distribution for women. Wages are estimated as a function of productivity measures for both men and women within each occupation. Our model finds that only 14 to 17 percent of the total wage differential is attributable to differences in endowments and that more of the unexplained difference results from within-rather than across-broad occupational categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Randall S. Brown & Marilyn Moon & Barbara S. Zoloth, 1980. "Incorporating Occupational Attainment in Studies of Male-Female Earnings Differentials," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 15(1), pages 3-28.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:15:y:1980:i:1:p:3-28

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:15:y:1980:i:1:p:3-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.