IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/urn/urnste/v1y2010i1p18-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applications Structuralist Method In Positive Law

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia ANDRITOI

    (Eftimie Murgu University of Resita, Romania)

Abstract

The etymology of legal rights suggests different meanings, being multi-semantic, designate diverse hypostases and involved complex relationships. Therefore, the term derives from the Latin rectum, directum. This word relates accordingly to everything that is right - receiving thus the meaning of referral, guidance - and opposes to what is divergent from that line. Also in this context are to be mentioned different language ratios, but with more or less similar meanings as that term is seen as in other languages. In German, recht - sends us to gerecht - just and to gerechtigkeit - justice. Therefore, in conclusion the legal right is what is just. For subjective legal right it is used the term Berechtigung. In English, the right is designated as subjective and law is referring to the objective right. In French, the objective right is usually spelt with capital letters - Droit, and the subjective right is point out with lowercase letters - droit. Law is regarded as a system along with the applications structuralist method - the systematic regularity of knowing the organization and operation of the right as a system of social organization. The development of a theory of legal interpretation involves the building of a system of statements that constitute an explanatory model about something from exterior, i.e. to explain the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia ANDRITOI, 2010. "Applications Structuralist Method In Positive Law," HOLISTICA Journal of Business and Public Administration, Association Holistic Research Academic (HoRA), vol. 1(1), pages 18-25, January-J.
  • Handle: RePEc:urn:urnste:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:18-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://holisticajournal.ro/details?pid=4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the legal transplants; Law “crisis”; dualism – monism; ontological character;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K33 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - International Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:urn:urnste:v:1:y:2010:i:1:p:18-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Claudiu Baicu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.