Author
Abstract
The research aims to design a method for identifying trends in municipal districts’ economic development in economic space of Russian regions. Municipal districts are a type of rural municipalities in Russia, therefore methodologically the paper relies on the theoretical propositions of both spatial and rural economics. The authors systematise Russian scholars’ approaches to the analysis of the municipalities’ socioeconomic development and based on this suggest their method for identifying constructive and destructive trends in economic development of municipal districts. The method encompasses four stages: assessment of scales of municipal districts’ presence in economic space of a region, assessment of municipal districts’ own economic dynamics, generalisation of these assessments and final identification of type of trends with the ultimate conclusions about municipal districts’ impact on the economic space of a region. The authors test the method at the example of Sverdlovsk oblast. According to the research findings, four out of five municipal districts in the oblast develop constructively. The only municipal district that has a destructive effect on economic space of the region is Slobodo-Turinsky municipal district. At this, the authors consider a trend constructive if it contributes to the development of economic space of a region, and destructive if it leads to its destruction. Theoretical and practical significance of the work is that the designed method allows not just assessing the economic dynamics of municipal districts but also linking it to the regional spatial economic development.
Suggested Citation
Elena B. DVORYADKINA & Elizaveta A. BELOUSOVA, 2018.
"Municipal Districts in Economic Space of a Region: Constructive and Destructive Trends,"
Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(5), pages 84-106, October.
Handle:
RePEc:url:izvest:v:19:y:2018:i:5:p:84-106
DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2018-19-5-7
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- P25 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:19:y:2018:i:5:p:84-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.