IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ula/econom/v21y1996i11p153-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects methods: An alternative for projects evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Sol Saavedra

    (Universidad de Los Andes, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Departamento de Empresas)

Abstract

La escasez, cada vez más acentuada, de recursos financieros a ser asignados en la ejecución de proyectos de inversión, tanto públicos como privados, amerita una selección más exigente cuantitativa y cualitativamente. Ello implica profundizar en el análisis de metodologías de evaluación, destacando aquellas que permitan proporcionar el máximo de información para la toma de decisiones. El Método de los Efectos al identificar impactos socioeconómicos hacia adelante y hacia atrás sobre los agentes participantes, y la vinculación de esos proyectos con el alcance de políticas contempladas en planes de desarrollo, viene a complementar las metodologías de evaluación existentes y su estudio y análisis es sin duda enriquecedor en la toma de decisiones. Valgan estas notas generales para iniciar el conocimiento del método.

Suggested Citation

  • Sol Saavedra, 1996. "The effects methods: An alternative for projects evaluation," Economía, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales (IIES). Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales. Universidad de Los Andes. Mérida, Venezuela, vol. 21(11), pages 153-179, January-D.
  • Handle: RePEc:ula:econom:v:21:y:1996:i:11:p:153-179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://iies.faces.ula.ve/Pdf/Revista11/Rev11Saavedra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Proyectos de inversión; método de los efectos; evaluación de proyectos.;

    JEL classification:

    • E20 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ula:econom:v:21:y:1996:i:11:p:153-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alexis Vásquez). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/iiulave.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.