IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uje/journl/y2013i6p4-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modernization Of Productive Forces As Determinant Of Sustainable Development Of Problematic Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Serhiy Shkarlet

    (Сhernihiv State Technological University)

  • Valeriy Ilchuk

    (Сhernihiv State Technological University)

  • Iryna Lysenko

    (Сhernihiv State Technological University)

Abstract

The transition to a market economy created a number of problems in the development of the regions of Ukraine. A sharp decline in production occurs, a number of employees decreases, an environmental component is deteriorated, a social situation in society is exacerbated and, consequently, the negative demographic processes occur in most regions. The combination of these negative factors led to significant problems in the development of the productive forces. Therefore, the solution of regional problems of economic and social development is an extremely important task for the central legislative and executive authorities. One of the ways to lead out the problematic regions from a deep systemic crisis is the modernization of the productive forces on the cluster approach basis, which implies a strategic restructuring of production, increasing workplaces amount, attracting highly skilled professionals, using innovative technologies in production, which in turn will significantly increase the investment attractiveness of problematic regions. In this article the essence of the concepts «sustainable development of the region» and «modernization of productive forces» were considered. It is proved, that the modernization of the productive forces based on the principles of cauterization is the determining factor for sustainable development of problematic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhiy Shkarlet & Valeriy Ilchuk & Iryna Lysenko, 2013. "Modernization Of Productive Forces As Determinant Of Sustainable Development Of Problematic Regions," Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, Yuriy Kovalenko, issue 6, pages 4-6, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2013:i:6:p:4-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2013:i:6:p:4-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vadym Bardas' (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ua-ekonomist.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.