IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jsbuii/v23y2019i1p50-66id12181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efisiensi dan produktivitas industri perbankan pada sistem moneter ganda di Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Aam Slamet Rusydiana
  • Nisful Laila
  • Sudana Sudana

Abstract

This study aims to examine the level of efficiency of 115 commercial banks in Indonesia for the period between 2010 and 2016. We use basic models of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) consisting of CCR (Charnes Cooper Rhodes) and BCC (Banker Charnes Cooper) models. This study also investigate the value of productivity of each bank which is then compared. The study finds that commercial banks in Indonesia exhibit an increase in productivity although it is relatively small. The stagnation of the level of productivity is due to the low level of technological change (technological change) rather than a decrease in efficiency (Efficiency change). Another interesting finding is that around 70 percent of the hypothetically relative credit market share in Indonesia is controlled by only 29.56 percent of commercial banks. This also means that around 30 percent of the remaining credit market share is contested by the rest of other banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Aam Slamet Rusydiana & Nisful Laila & Sudana Sudana, 2019. "Efisiensi dan produktivitas industri perbankan pada sistem moneter ganda di Indonesia," Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, Management Development Centre (MDC) Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 23(1), pages 50-66.
    • Handle: RePEc:uii:jsbuii:v:23:y:2019:i:1:p:50-66:id:12181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/article/view/12181/9602
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jsbuii:v:23:y:2019:i:1:p:50-66:id:12181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JSB/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.