IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jekife/v3y2017i1p10-18id10728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analisis perbandingan kinerja saham syariah antara DJIMI, FSTE GIIS, KLSESI, dan JII

Author

Listed:
  • Novita Kusuma Maharani

Abstract

This research investigates whether the difference of Sharia stock screening mechanism in some countries will influence the index and stock performance. Some countries have a tight screening policy and the other countries have a loose screening policy. This research investigates 4 Sharia indices DJIMI, FTSE GIIS, KLSESI, and JII since October 2012 until September 2014. This research shows that the performance of the Sharia stock index is not affected by how tight the screening process of that index. Although KLSESI index has the tightest stock screening policy, but the performance is not different with the Sharia stock which has loosest stock screening policy which is DJMI index. When we compare the return of each index, the performance of the 4 indices shows insignificant different. The performance of JII stock which has the looser stock screening policy is also not different with the KLSESI stock performance which has the tighter stock screening policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Novita Kusuma Maharani, 2017. "Analisis perbandingan kinerja saham syariah antara DJIMI, FSTE GIIS, KLSESI, dan JII," Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 3(1), pages 10-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:10-18:id:10728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/article/view/10728/8320
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jekife:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:10-18:id:10728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEKI/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.