IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/udc/esteco/v24y1997i2p287-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects for avoiding crises with liberalized capital flows

Author

Listed:
  • John Williamson

Abstract

The history of Latin America’s relations with the international capital market has not been a happy one. Debt crises have recurred with monotonous regularity ever since the 1820’s, about three years after the first loans were contracted by newly independent countries. Despite the theoretical benefits that we all know capital flows can bring, it is easy to believe that Latin America’s history would have been happier had the region never borrowed a penny. The liberalization of capital flows will make the region more rather than less exposed t such crises. Are there nevertheless any reason for believing that the future may be happier than the past? I shall argue that there are in fact three such reasons: the changing composition of capital inflows, the possibility that countries will learn by experience, and the analogous possibility that capital markets will also learn by experience and come to take a longer term view.

Suggested Citation

  • John Williamson, 1997. "Prospects for avoiding crises with liberalized capital flows," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 24(2 Year 19), pages 287-295, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:287-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.uchile.cl/uploads/publicacion/4e4f6b10-5c4c-4183-9a9f-984f854a4834.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter Blair Henry & Peter Lombard Lorentzen, 2003. "Domestic Capital Market Reform and Access to Global Finance: Making Markets Work," NBER Working Papers 10064, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Peter Blair Henry, 2007. "Capital Account Liberalization: Theory, Evidence, and Speculation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 45(4), pages 887-935, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:24:y:1997:i:2:p:287-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Verónica Kunze). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.