IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/scerev/doi10.1086-664565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Choice & Interest Groups in the Development of American Patent Law: 1790–1865

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew P. Morriss
  • Craig Allen Nard

Abstract

This article analyzes the evolution of U.S. patent law between the first patent act in 1790 and 1865. We argue that this evolution is best understood through an interest group-based analysis, focused on the question of the choice of which institution interest groups select in their efforts to alter the law. Although the federal courts have generally been viewed as relatively costly to capture, we contend that the early nineteenth-century federal bench was often less costly for pro-patent interests to influence than the contemporaneous Congresses. The heavy reliance on the courts during this crucial period of patent law’s evolution thus makes sense.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew P. Morriss & Craig Allen Nard, 2011. "Institutional Choice & Interest Groups in the Development of American Patent Law: 1790–1865," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 143-244.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/664565
    DOI: 10.1086/664565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664565
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664565
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/664565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/664565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/SCER .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.